COVID-19 Update: We are here for you, our clients. Learn more
Wednesday August 28, 2019

What’s the Buzz in Music Plagiarism Lawsuits?

Authored by: Marc J. Belliveau Posted in: Intellectual Property

During the last century, composers, musicians and their copyright lawyers held a traditional belief and legal understanding that copyright infringement lawsuits related only to stolen lyrics and copied melodies, but not for more abstract compositional elements like rhythm, beats, vibe, sound and feel.

Song Composition Plagiarism

One of the most famous music copyright infringement cases involved The Beatles’ guitarist George Harrison in 1976. The court found that Harrison’s “My Sweet Lord” infringed the 1963 doo-wop hit “He’s So Fine” by The Chiffons. The similarities between the songs related to almost identical chord and scale descents and ascents in the chorus and verses. Ultimately, the judge found that the two songs were the same, with different words, and that Harrison had subconsciously copied the earlier tune even if he had not done so deliberately.

Since that time, music copyright infringement cases have focused on such comparable compositional elements, like song structure, chords, melodies, keys, choruses, hooks and so on.

Vibe, Sound & Feel Plagiarism

That all changed a few years ago in the infamous “Blurred Lines” case, when a US court ordered the song’s writers, Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams, to pay $5 million to the heirs of Marvin Gaye, who sued for copyright infringement. The two songs are in different keys and have different chord progressions, but they both have a funky cowbell and electric piano as the main instrumentation. Relying on expert witness testimony, the judge agreed that the international hit was very similar to, and accordingly infringed, the “vibe” and “feel” of Gaye’s 1977 hit “Got to Give It Up”.

Katy Perry’s 2013 hit song “Dark Horse” led to a similar result. A unanimous jury ruled that her song infringed the 2009 song “Joyful Noise” by rapper Flame and awarded $2.8 million. The judge accepted expert evidence concluding the two songs had nearly identical ostinatos, in phrase length, rhythm, pitch content and timbre.

These court decisions were criticized because they effectively “privatized” basic building blocks of music composition and because the essential alphabet of music creation should be available to everyone. Copyright law tends to monopolize the expression of ideas, often to a greater extent than what is in the public interest. It can also have a chilling effect on cultural evolution.

More Lawsuits to Come

Copycat cases have been popping up across the US since that time. Recently, Ed Sheeran was sued for copyright infringement, in respect of his 2014 smash hit “Thinking Out Loud”, by the estate of Marvin Gaye alleging that Sheeran used the same melodic, harmonic and rhythmic elements as the 1973 Gaye soul music hit “Let’s Get It On”. The plaintiff is claiming damages of $100 million.

But the mother of all music copyright cases currently winding its way through the courts is the plagiarism attack on the iconic 1971 rock anthem “Stairway to Heaven” by Led Zeppelin. The claim alleges the song’s opening chord arpeggio progression is identical to the 1968 instrumental song “Taurus” by the group Spirit. The evidentiary and procedural issues are quite complex, but observers expect the case to go all the way to the US Supreme Court for final determination. If successful, the lawsuit could result in an award of $550 million. Stay tuned!

Suing from Beyond the Grave

A major factor in many of these recent music plagiarism lawsuits is the fact that the plaintiffs are not the artists themselves; they are the heirs or family members of artists who died or retired, with much to gain and nothing to lose. While a living artist might have reservations about suing another artist for copying a song, because of potential reputational harm or record label retribution, the heirs, executors and corporate receivers don’t work in the music business and do not have such reservations or concerns. They are motivated solely by the potential economic windfall.

Money and the courts are driving essential musical building blocks out of the hands of the many, into the hands of the few. This situation is another unsurprising economic outcome of a copyright ownership term surviving the death of the author. The songwriters’ and musicians’ heirs, whether intentionally or not, are causing creative havoc in the new music world with these lawsuits.

If you would like more information about copyright law, please contact our Trademark Agent, Marc Belliveau.

Share This Post:

Ask a question about this post.

Any Questions

Recent Blog Posts

Blog Post | Friday July 17, 2020

Return to treatment series: Get your healthcare even during the COVID-19 pandemic

Authored by: Shafic A. Khouri Authored by: David S.R. Parker Posted in: COVID-19 Personal Injury

Recently, governments have started to ease restrictions and, as a result, healthcare providers have started opening their doors for in-person treatments. We asked chiropractor Dr. Liam Ryan a few questions about the clinic Nova Physiotherapy and how it is operating during this time.

Read full article
Blog Post | Tuesday July 7, 2020

Don’t let COVID-19 stop you from getting the healthcare treatment you need

Authored by: Shafic A. Khouri Authored by: David S.R. Parker Posted in: COVID-19 Personal Injury

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted many of the activities and routines in people’s daily lives. We asked chiropractor Kate MacAdam at Dr. MacAdam and Associates a few questions about her clinic and how it is operating during this time.

Read full article
Blog Post | Thursday June 25, 2020

Saskatchewan Bill 205 – Changes for Surrogates and Intended Parents

Authored by: Terrance G. Sheppard Authored by: Kelsey J. Webb Posted in: Family Law

Bill 205 passed royal assent on March 16th. Although the Act is not yet in force, the changes led to some much-needed updates to Saskatchewan’s Children’s Law Act and fertility law.

Read full article
Blog Post | Monday June 22, 2020

What is the award for your pain and suffering from a vehicle collision?

Authored by: Shafic A. Khouri Authored by: David S.R. Parker Posted in: Personal Injury

If you suffered minor injuries from a motor vehicle collision, Nova Scotia law sets a limit for the amount you can be awarded for your pain and suffering. This limit depends on the year in which the collision happened.

Read full article