Thursday January 26, 2017

Health Canada Looking to Develop Regulations Governing the Reimbursement of Expenditures to Surrogates

Authored by: Terrance G. Sheppard Posted in: Family Law

In a Press Release dated September 30, 2016, Health Canada announced they were looking at making several adaptations to the regulations under the Assisted Human Reproduction Act (“AHRA”).  Specifically, they are looking at:

The first two items are likely to be reasonably uncontroversial; It has always been an oddity that donor semen regulation was under the Food and Drug Act.  However, the proposal to regulate reimbursable expenses for surrogates has caused a lot of consternation. 

Currently, the AHRA states: 

The AHRA was passed by the Federal Government in March of 2004.   Almost immediately they began gathering information and preparing procedures to regulate the reimbursement of expenditures to surrogates.  In the current regulation, Section 65(1)(e) allows the government to pass regulations respecting the reasonable expenditures that may be reimbursed.

In 2007 they published a Public Consultation Document looking for public feedback and input. Findings showed many believed that the proposed regulations were very restrictive.  The Canadian Bar Association made submissions to Health Canada in September 2007 which proposed to expand the expenses that could be reimbursed.  In their submission the CBA stated:

“The categories set out in the Consultation Document for Expenditures related to surrogacy are, in our view, far too narrow.  Again, the list should not be exhaustive.”  

The fear with the pending regulations is that they will be too narrow and fewer and fewer women will want to become a surrogate.  This could drive Canadian intended parents to the United States or overseas looking for surrogates where there is little regulation and the cost are high.

If there are any questions related to fertility law, contact Terrance G. Sheppard.

Share This Post:

Ask a question about this post.

Any Questions

Recent Blog Posts

Blog Post | Thursday November 7, 2019

Trademark Basics: What is a Trademark?

Authored by: Marc J. Belliveau Posted in: Intellectual Property

Canadian trademark practice is evolving every year due to technological advancements in brand marketing and changes in the law itself, whether through legislative amendments to the Trademarks Act or as a result of new judicial interpretations.

Read full article
Blog Post | Tuesday October 8, 2019

Supreme Court finds Crown owns Copyright in Land Surveys

Authored by: Marc J. Belliveau Posted in: Intellectual Property

It is not often that our Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) decides a copyright case. So, it’s always exciting to read their latest thoughts on the interpretation of the Copyright Act (“Act”).

Read full article
Blog Post | Tuesday September 17, 2019

What are Statutory Damages for Copyright Infringement?

Authored by: Marc J. Belliveau Posted in: Intellectual Property

When you sue someone for copying your original work of art, music, drama or fiction without your permission, it’s often difficult, time consuming and very costly to calculate and prove the full amount of your financial losses.

Read full article
Blog Post | Wednesday August 28, 2019

What’s the Buzz in Music Plagiarism Lawsuits?

Authored by: Marc J. Belliveau Posted in: Intellectual Property

During the last century, composers, musicians and their copyright lawyers held a traditional belief and legal understanding that copyright infringement lawsuits related only to stolen lyrics and copied melodies, but not for more abstract compositional elements.

Read full article